Skip to content

Pelosi’s Health Care Means Rationing Politics – WSJ.com

November 10, 2009

NancyPelosiRedDressREVIEW & OUTLOOK NOVEMBER 10, 2009

The Lords of Entitlement

Speaker Nancy Pelosi defied policy logic and public opinion late Saturday night, ramming through the House a nearly 2,000-page health-care leviathan that counts as the biggest expansion of the federal government since the New Deal. As President Obama likes to say, this was a “teachable moment” about America’s current government.

The vote was 220 to 215, with 39 House Democrats joining all but one Republican in opposition. Mrs. Pelosi had to cajole and bribe her way to the magic 218, and the list of her promises must be stacked to the ceiling.

The lone Republican, Joseph Cao, represents a Democratic-leaning Louisiana district and extracted a promise that Mr. Obama would increase Medicaid payments to his state, and even then he only voted after Democrats had already hit 218. Let no one suggest this was the “bipartisan” health reform that Mr. Obama has long promised.

***

The bill is instead a breathtaking display of illiberal ambition, intended to make the middle class more dependent on government through the umbilical cord of “universal health care.” It creates a vast new entitlement, financed by European levels of taxation on business and individuals. The 20% corner of Medicare open to private competition is slashed, while fiscally strapped states are saddled with new Medicaid burdens. The insurance industry will have to vet every policy with Washington, which will regulate who it must cover, what it can offer, and how much it can charge.

We have little sympathy for the insurers, or for that matter most of the other medical providers who signed on to this process only to claim now to be appalled by the result. The insurance lobby—led by Aetna CEO Ron Williams—made the Faustian bet that it could trade new regulations for more new subsidized customers who would face a tax penalty if they didn’t buy their insurance. The Pelosi bill includes the regulation but guts the tax penalty because it’s unpopular. Insurers will thus have to cover more sick people with fewer dollars, as healthy folk opt out of coverage until they are sick.

via Pelosi’s Health Care Means Rationing Politics – WSJ.com.

3 Comments
  1. Carterthewriter permalink
    November 10, 2009 11:00 AM

    Pick a number as you do when entering a Social Security office, but hope an elitist hasn’t entered through the back door with a frivilous health complaint.

  2. November 13, 2009 10:37 AM

    Laura Ingraham”s opinion is off base when she says that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did everything except sell her body to get the House health plan passed.
    It is my opinion that if she really did offer to sell her body to get the bill passed it surely would have gone down in flames.
    Joe Hoffman
    Dana Point CA

Trackbacks

  1. News You Need to Know 10Nov09 | Mega Glomerate Main-Stream Media

Comments are closed.